Why is Tesla not trusted? It is a car and not a car ??


 Tesla's evaluation in Japan is not very high.

 Of course, some fans are enthusiastic, but even if you look at car -specialized media such as "Best Car", it is rarely introduced.If you like general cars, you will not be interested.

 Under such circumstances, a prestigious consumer report in the United States made Tesla low.It seems to be the same in the United States.why?I want to think carefully.

Sentence / Mitsuhiro Kunisawa, Photo / Tesla Motors, Best Car Editorial Department

[Image gallery] This article has not been posted!Check the rich lineup of Tesla, the male of electric vehicles


■ Atsi to think about the safety of cars?

 In the first place, I do not trust Tesla.The reason is easy.This is because there are many accidents that are thought to be caused by cars, but there is no information disclosure from Tesla.

テスラはなぜ信頼されないのか? クルマであって“クルマ“でない??

 Did you remember a painful accident that Tesla rushed into a stopped motorcycle at the Tomei Expressway in Golden Week in 2018 and died alone?

 I heard from an acquaintance of the owner, but when I purchased Tesla that caused the accident, the sales representative advanced the "autonomous driving option" and ordered.

 Even at the time of the accident, the owner would have sitting on the driving sheet thinking that it was automatic driving.He could not detect vehicles that had stopped in the accident and rushed without deceleration.

 The accident seems to be claiming that "Tesla is not an autonomous driving device, so the driver's responsibility."

 Certainly, as of 2018, the "level 3" of autonomous driving (the sovereign of driving) does not exist all over the world, so all accidents are the responsibility of the driver -it is clearly white.Therefore, a safety device will be attached so that ordinary car manufacturers do not become automatic driving.

■ Tesla does not have any natural "safety measures" for other manufacturers

 As of 2018, there were many cars with the accelerator, brake operation, and lane keeping (lane deviation prevention) functions, but if all of them are 10 km/h or more, if you do not have a handle of 10 seconds or more, after warning.Cut the function.

 If you let go of a continuous driving like Tesla, the car will be a weapon, as it will be a wakimi or sleep.

 Also, Nissan's "Propilot 2.Some cars have a driving mode like "0", but they are always monitoring the driver with the camera, and if you do not look in front, you will cut the function after the warning.

 This kind of response is not limited to Japanese automakers, but all American manufacturers except Europe and Tesla are doing it.Or rather, it is natural for automakers.

 In addition to protecting the users who bought the car, the vehicle called the car, as mentioned above, becomes a strong destructive weapon when runaway.The accident on the Tomei Road has also become a weapon.

 In order to avoid it, it is also the responsibility of the car manufacturer to create a system that does not become a weapon as possible.Tesla does not do such obvious things.

 Not only the accident on the Tomei Road, but also a fatal accident in the United States because it misunderstood that it was automatic driving.Both claimed that the driver's responsibility.There is no reflection on the dangerous equipment without taking safety measures.

 A limited environment (circuits and private land) is allowed to be a function that does not take care of safety.But I want you to use it on public roads.

The next page is: ■ car, not a car?Tesla's "product"

Tags: